I'm officially confused about the 16 words debate (that is, the debate about Bush's claim in his State of the Union address that Iraq had attempted to procure uranium from Niger). As far as I can tell, either Josh Marshall is a biased hack or Gregory Djerejian is.
The back and forth is dizzying. Check out this post from Gregory Djerejian, for an example of the kind of criticism Marshall is getting.
Innocent question from the sidelines of this debate: Does Djerejian expect me to keep a straight face when he ends a post slagging Marshall for inaccuracy and partisanship by approvingly linking to a column of William Safire's which is, typically, riddled with errors?
Posted by Chris at July 19, 2004 11:08 AMChris,
I see what you mean ... but, if you can believe, it gets worse: today Djerejian actually linked to Laura Rozen. Imagine!
http://www.belgraviadispatch.com/archives/001485.html
Posted by: Paul Craddick at July 20, 2004 01:18 PM