<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Recently read: A Supposedly Fun Thing I&#8217;ll Never Do Again</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.explananda.com/2009/02/02/recently-read-a-supposedly-fun-thing-ill-never-do-again/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.explananda.com/2009/02/02/recently-read-a-supposedly-fun-thing-ill-never-do-again/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2010 00:02:49 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.explananda.com/2009/02/02/recently-read-a-supposedly-fun-thing-ill-never-do-again/comment-page-1/#comment-6820</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 13:41:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.explananda.com/?p=2802#comment-6820</guid>
		<description>The math stuff in the first essay of ASFTINDA struck me as the only possibly false note in the book.  For one thing, it seemed dubious, as I said.  But he also seemed not terribly interested in making sure I understood what he was talking about, which is sort of how a person writes when they know they&#039;re saying something dubious.  On the other hand, it&#039;s hard to square that with my impression with the rest of the book.  I&#039;m sort of curious about what a mathematically trained person might make of Everything And More.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The math stuff in the first essay of ASFTINDA struck me as the only possibly false note in the book.  For one thing, it seemed dubious, as I said.  But he also seemed not terribly interested in making sure I understood what he was talking about, which is sort of how a person writes when they know they&#8217;re saying something dubious.  On the other hand, it&#8217;s hard to square that with my impression with the rest of the book.  I&#8217;m sort of curious about what a mathematically trained person might make of Everything And More.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Laniel</title>
		<link>http://www.explananda.com/2009/02/02/recently-read-a-supposedly-fun-thing-ill-never-do-again/comment-page-1/#comment-6818</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Laniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 01:17:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.explananda.com/?p=2802#comment-6818</guid>
		<description>Everything And More *is* available used for $7, for what it&#039;s worth. And my &lt;a href=&quot;http://library.minlib.net/search~S1?/teverything+and+more/teverything+and+more/1%2C2%2C4%2CB/frameset&amp;FF=teverything+and+more+a+compact+history+of+infinity&amp;1%2C1%2C&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;friendly neighborhood network of libraries has it&lt;/a&gt;. (This information will be valuable only to those who live within Massachusetts, I&#039;m afraid.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everything And More *is* available used for $7, for what it&#8217;s worth. And my <a href="http://library.minlib.net/search~S1?/teverything+and+more/teverything+and+more/1%2C2%2C4%2CB/frameset&amp;FF=teverything+and+more+a+compact+history+of+infinity&amp;1%2C1%2C" rel="nofollow">friendly neighborhood network of libraries has it</a>. (This information will be valuable only to those who live within Massachusetts, I&#8217;m afraid.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Laniel</title>
		<link>http://www.explananda.com/2009/02/02/recently-read-a-supposedly-fun-thing-ill-never-do-again/comment-page-1/#comment-6817</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Laniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 01:09:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.explananda.com/?p=2802#comment-6817</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m so, so, so glad you enjoyed ASFTINDA. It&#039;s my favorite Wallace work. Infinite Jest is also astounding, but it&#039;s certainly not the place to start. Like you say, I think the title essay in ASFTINDA is that place.

I&#039;ve not tried Wallace&#039;s book about math (Everything And More); I just don&#039;t trust him to write that in a non-wanky way. It&#039;s just on the cusp, though: he&#039;s a great enough writer that maybe his awesomeness will offset his lack of qualifications. I&#039;m picky about my math-books-written-for-mass-audiences. I&#039;m even pickier about statistics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m so, so, so glad you enjoyed ASFTINDA. It&#8217;s my favorite Wallace work. Infinite Jest is also astounding, but it&#8217;s certainly not the place to start. Like you say, I think the title essay in ASFTINDA is that place.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve not tried Wallace&#8217;s book about math (Everything And More); I just don&#8217;t trust him to write that in a non-wanky way. It&#8217;s just on the cusp, though: he&#8217;s a great enough writer that maybe his awesomeness will offset his lack of qualifications. I&#8217;m picky about my math-books-written-for-mass-audiences. I&#8217;m even pickier about statistics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
