<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Recently read: In Praise of Slowness</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.explananda.com/2008/12/07/recently-read-in-praise-of-slowness/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.explananda.com/2008/12/07/recently-read-in-praise-of-slowness/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 17:53:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: DC</title>
		<link>http://www.explananda.com/2008/12/07/recently-read-in-praise-of-slowness/comment-page-1/#comment-6624</link>
		<dc:creator>DC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 12:26:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.explananda.com/?p=2649#comment-6624</guid>
		<description>The only Naipaul I&#039;ve read is Half a Life and it didn&#039;t do anything for me. Cold stuff certainly. (If I were writing a review I&#039;d use the word dyspeptic, but if I were writing a review I&#039;d also look it up to make sure I was using it right.)

Re: Unbearable Lightness (which i keep on calling/typing as &quot;Eternal Lightness...&quot;), I&#039;m kind of in the opposite boat to Chris in that I read it once, thought it was fantastic but also had a nagging feeling that I needed to read it again after a while to see if I felt it stood up. Must do that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only Naipaul I&#8217;ve read is Half a Life and it didn&#8217;t do anything for me. Cold stuff certainly. (If I were writing a review I&#8217;d use the word dyspeptic, but if I were writing a review I&#8217;d also look it up to make sure I was using it right.)</p>
<p>Re: Unbearable Lightness (which i keep on calling/typing as &#8220;Eternal Lightness&#8230;&#8221;), I&#8217;m kind of in the opposite boat to Chris in that I read it once, thought it was fantastic but also had a nagging feeling that I needed to read it again after a while to see if I felt it stood up. Must do that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.explananda.com/2008/12/07/recently-read-in-praise-of-slowness/comment-page-1/#comment-6623</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 03:43:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.explananda.com/?p=2649#comment-6623</guid>
		<description>Evil commenter/villain Kegri repeatedly insisted that I read Tom Robbins when we were both 19 years old and living together in Munich for a summer.  I finally gave in and did.  It was really awful.

Did you know that love is . . . oh, I can&#039;t even remember.  Something cliched.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Evil commenter/villain Kegri repeatedly insisted that I read Tom Robbins when we were both 19 years old and living together in Munich for a summer.  I finally gave in and did.  It was really awful.</p>
<p>Did you know that love is . . . oh, I can&#8217;t even remember.  Something cliched.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Laniel</title>
		<link>http://www.explananda.com/2008/12/07/recently-read-in-praise-of-slowness/comment-page-1/#comment-6622</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Laniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 03:20:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.explananda.com/?p=2649#comment-6622</guid>
		<description>Huh. I don&#039;t know a thing about Theroux. I thought I was sad about that. Maybe I&#039;m not sad about that.

Oh, and then there&#039;s Tom Robbins. He has one idea, repeated over many books. Back when I was an impressionable youth, I really enjoyed Jitterbug Perfume. The same friend who&#039;s reading East of Eden read Jitterbug Perfume not long ago, and disabused me of my flawed memories.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Huh. I don&#8217;t know a thing about Theroux. I thought I was sad about that. Maybe I&#8217;m not sad about that.</p>
<p>Oh, and then there&#8217;s Tom Robbins. He has one idea, repeated over many books. Back when I was an impressionable youth, I really enjoyed Jitterbug Perfume. The same friend who&#8217;s reading East of Eden read Jitterbug Perfume not long ago, and disabused me of my flawed memories.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.explananda.com/2008/12/07/recently-read-in-praise-of-slowness/comment-page-1/#comment-6621</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 02:55:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.explananda.com/?p=2649#comment-6621</guid>
		<description>I have noticed that you didn&#039;t like &quot;A Bend in the River.&quot;  I don&#039;t recall having quite as strong a reaction to it as you, but I do remember feeling that the main character was very cold, somehow.  I&#039;ve had &quot;Things Fall Apart&quot; on my to-read list for at least 15 years now.  Some day!

Speaking of people who don&#039;t like Naipaul, what do you make of Paul Theroux?  I&#039;ve read a couple of his books and come away with the impression that he&#039;s utterly repellent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have noticed that you didn&#8217;t like &#8220;A Bend in the River.&#8221;  I don&#8217;t recall having quite as strong a reaction to it as you, but I do remember feeling that the main character was very cold, somehow.  I&#8217;ve had &#8220;Things Fall Apart&#8221; on my to-read list for at least 15 years now.  Some day!</p>
<p>Speaking of people who don&#8217;t like Naipaul, what do you make of Paul Theroux?  I&#8217;ve read a couple of his books and come away with the impression that he&#8217;s utterly repellent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Laniel</title>
		<link>http://www.explananda.com/2008/12/07/recently-read-in-praise-of-slowness/comment-page-1/#comment-6620</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Laniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 02:50:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.explananda.com/?p=2649#comment-6620</guid>
		<description>Hey, while we&#039;re on the topic of books that are supposed to be good but maybe aren&#039;t: George Packer&#039;s recent &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/23/books/review/Packer-t.html?_r=1&amp;ref=books&amp;pagewanted=all&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;review of a V.S. Naipaul biography&lt;/a&gt; (see also his &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/georgepacker/2008/11/the-artist-as-m.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;blog post previewing the review&lt;/a&gt;; the preview got me very excited for the review) reminded me of how very much I loathed Naipaul&#039;s &quot;A Bend In The River.&quot; It seemed lifeless and astringent, and it didn&#039;t surprise me at all that the man was a monster in his personal life.

I actually haven&#039;t been able to get into any books that might be described as &quot;postcolonial.&quot; I&#039;ve tried Naipaul, &quot;Things Fall Apart,&quot; Ghosh&#039;s &quot;Glass Palace,&quot; and a number of others that I can&#039;t remember right now; they all seem really shallow. Maybe they&#039;d do more for me if I were colonized rather than colonizer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, while we&#8217;re on the topic of books that are supposed to be good but maybe aren&#8217;t: George Packer&#8217;s recent <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/23/books/review/Packer-t.html?_r=1&amp;ref=books&amp;pagewanted=all" rel="nofollow">review of a V.S. Naipaul biography</a> (see also his <a href="http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/georgepacker/2008/11/the-artist-as-m.html" rel="nofollow">blog post previewing the review</a>; the preview got me very excited for the review) reminded me of how very much I loathed Naipaul&#8217;s &#8220;A Bend In The River.&#8221; It seemed lifeless and astringent, and it didn&#8217;t surprise me at all that the man was a monster in his personal life.</p>
<p>I actually haven&#8217;t been able to get into any books that might be described as &#8220;postcolonial.&#8221; I&#8217;ve tried Naipaul, &#8220;Things Fall Apart,&#8221; Ghosh&#8217;s &#8220;Glass Palace,&#8221; and a number of others that I can&#8217;t remember right now; they all seem really shallow. Maybe they&#8217;d do more for me if I were colonized rather than colonizer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.explananda.com/2008/12/07/recently-read-in-praise-of-slowness/comment-page-1/#comment-6619</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 02:34:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.explananda.com/?p=2649#comment-6619</guid>
		<description>I read through most (all?) of Kundera&#039;s books up to and including Unbearable Lightness in high school.  I remember telling my dad that they were really good.  He read Unbearable Lightness, and then pointed out how insipid and shallow Kundera&#039;s view of his characters is.  A sort of light died in my eyes.  This is the gift my father gave me, and which I try to pass on to others.

The way Kundera tries to blend essay and fiction into a single form is really intriguing.  If he could pull it off it would be really extraordinary.  But he can&#039;t.  It&#039;s ok to have stunted to characters.  That can make for some interesting fiction.  But the essays make clear that the characters often describe certain limits in Kundera&#039;s appreciation of human beings.  The lustless sex is only the start of the problem.  

I&#039;ve been meaning to go back and do a big reread to figure out if I&#039;m missing something.  Perhaps some day.

East of Eden seems to me like a bunch of other Steinbeck books - awesome in a seriously flawed way.  (I still haven&#039;t read Grapes of Wrath.)  I read that in high school too, so it was a long time ago.  But I still remember being very moved by the final page.   I won&#039;t ruin it for anyone by describing any further.  

Some pretty fun Steinbeck is Cannery Row.  If you haven&#039;t read that, well, you just have to.  Tortilla Flat is set in the same place, with many of the same characters.  It&#039;s good, but not quite as good as Cannery Row.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read through most (all?) of Kundera&#8217;s books up to and including Unbearable Lightness in high school.  I remember telling my dad that they were really good.  He read Unbearable Lightness, and then pointed out how insipid and shallow Kundera&#8217;s view of his characters is.  A sort of light died in my eyes.  This is the gift my father gave me, and which I try to pass on to others.</p>
<p>The way Kundera tries to blend essay and fiction into a single form is really intriguing.  If he could pull it off it would be really extraordinary.  But he can&#8217;t.  It&#8217;s ok to have stunted to characters.  That can make for some interesting fiction.  But the essays make clear that the characters often describe certain limits in Kundera&#8217;s appreciation of human beings.  The lustless sex is only the start of the problem.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been meaning to go back and do a big reread to figure out if I&#8217;m missing something.  Perhaps some day.</p>
<p>East of Eden seems to me like a bunch of other Steinbeck books &#8211; awesome in a seriously flawed way.  (I still haven&#8217;t read Grapes of Wrath.)  I read that in high school too, so it was a long time ago.  But I still remember being very moved by the final page.   I won&#8217;t ruin it for anyone by describing any further.  </p>
<p>Some pretty fun Steinbeck is Cannery Row.  If you haven&#8217;t read that, well, you just have to.  Tortilla Flat is set in the same place, with many of the same characters.  It&#8217;s good, but not quite as good as Cannery Row.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DC</title>
		<link>http://www.explananda.com/2008/12/07/recently-read-in-praise-of-slowness/comment-page-1/#comment-6618</link>
		<dc:creator>DC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 01:45:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.explananda.com/?p=2649#comment-6618</guid>
		<description>Oh I thought Unbearable Lightness was completely fantastic, and the Book of Laughter and Forgetting was good too and I&#039;m about to start the Joke. I think I was dissapointed with Slowness and with Identity but I read them in French so I thought maybe that was the problem. 

I did have some nagging fear that maybe a person who was better read in fiction than me would see through Unbearable Lightness of Being somehow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh I thought Unbearable Lightness was completely fantastic, and the Book of Laughter and Forgetting was good too and I&#8217;m about to start the Joke. I think I was dissapointed with Slowness and with Identity but I read them in French so I thought maybe that was the problem. </p>
<p>I did have some nagging fear that maybe a person who was better read in fiction than me would see through Unbearable Lightness of Being somehow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Laniel</title>
		<link>http://www.explananda.com/2008/12/07/recently-read-in-praise-of-slowness/comment-page-1/#comment-6617</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Laniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 01:10:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.explananda.com/?p=2649#comment-6617</guid>
		<description>That last comment, right there? That is terrific.

I feel bad for having read a lot when I was younger and having not written reviews, because now I just don&#039;t have the arsenal to come to Kundera&#039;s defense. I read &quot;The Joke&quot; back then, and &quot;The Unthinkable Touchiness of Czechs&quot; or whatever it&#039;s called. I seem to recall their being good books. I remember that they had something to do with kitsch, in a certain totalitarian sense of kitsch. Like, kitsch isn&#039;t just tchotchkes; it&#039;s the whole way in which people are forced to feel regimented emotion within a totalitarian state. Something like this. I can&#039;t remember much more about it, and come to think of it I&#039;m pretty sure it was just a long lecture channeled through the mouths of its protagonists while they have lustless sex. But I could be wrong.

A friend right now is reading &quot;East of Eden,&quot; which I adored at the time. But I can&#039;t remember a goddamn thing about it now. Er, one thing: it recapitulates the Cain-and-Abel story through several generations of the Trask family. That&#039;s literally all I can remember about EoE. Which saddens me: at the time I loved that book, and now my friend says he&#039;s pretty sure it&#039;s the best book he&#039;s ever read (!). I also loved &quot;The Grapes of Wrath,&quot; which I read somewhat after EoE, but ... yeah, I remember nothing at all about TGoW. Nothing at all.

Damn.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That last comment, right there? That is terrific.</p>
<p>I feel bad for having read a lot when I was younger and having not written reviews, because now I just don&#8217;t have the arsenal to come to Kundera&#8217;s defense. I read &#8220;The Joke&#8221; back then, and &#8220;The Unthinkable Touchiness of Czechs&#8221; or whatever it&#8217;s called. I seem to recall their being good books. I remember that they had something to do with kitsch, in a certain totalitarian sense of kitsch. Like, kitsch isn&#8217;t just tchotchkes; it&#8217;s the whole way in which people are forced to feel regimented emotion within a totalitarian state. Something like this. I can&#8217;t remember much more about it, and come to think of it I&#8217;m pretty sure it was just a long lecture channeled through the mouths of its protagonists while they have lustless sex. But I could be wrong.</p>
<p>A friend right now is reading &#8220;East of Eden,&#8221; which I adored at the time. But I can&#8217;t remember a goddamn thing about it now. Er, one thing: it recapitulates the Cain-and-Abel story through several generations of the Trask family. That&#8217;s literally all I can remember about EoE. Which saddens me: at the time I loved that book, and now my friend says he&#8217;s pretty sure it&#8217;s the best book he&#8217;s ever read (!). I also loved &#8220;The Grapes of Wrath,&#8221; which I read somewhat after EoE, but &#8230; yeah, I remember nothing at all about TGoW. Nothing at all.</p>
<p>Damn.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.explananda.com/2008/12/07/recently-read-in-praise-of-slowness/comment-page-1/#comment-6616</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 21:45:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.explananda.com/?p=2649#comment-6616</guid>
		<description>Kundera&#039;s book was mentioned in this book.  

One of my hobbies is trying to convince people that Milan Kundera sucks.  It&#039;s fun.  If you watch closely you can actually see a sort of light die in their eyes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kundera&#8217;s book was mentioned in this book.  </p>
<p>One of my hobbies is trying to convince people that Milan Kundera sucks.  It&#8217;s fun.  If you watch closely you can actually see a sort of light die in their eyes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DC</title>
		<link>http://www.explananda.com/2008/12/07/recently-read-in-praise-of-slowness/comment-page-1/#comment-6615</link>
		<dc:creator>DC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 20:26:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.explananda.com/?p=2649#comment-6615</guid>
		<description>Milan Kundera has a novel called &quot;Slowness&quot;. I have read this novel - possibly too quickly - and don&#039;t remember much about it now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Milan Kundera has a novel called &#8220;Slowness&#8221;. I have read this novel &#8211; possibly too quickly &#8211; and don&#8217;t remember much about it now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.explananda.com/2008/12/07/recently-read-in-praise-of-slowness/comment-page-1/#comment-6597</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 14:24:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.explananda.com/?p=2649#comment-6597</guid>
		<description>Steve, increasingly people are more and more coming to see that dubious factoids support lumping analytical skills with speed.  To see whether there was anything to this, I spoke to the friend of a friend who told me that when her life was busier she was more into analyzing things.  Quick!  On to the next topic!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve, increasingly people are more and more coming to see that dubious factoids support lumping analytical skills with speed.  To see whether there was anything to this, I spoke to the friend of a friend who told me that when her life was busier she was more into analyzing things.  Quick!  On to the next topic!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Laniel</title>
		<link>http://www.explananda.com/2008/12/07/recently-read-in-praise-of-slowness/comment-page-1/#comment-6592</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Laniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2008 23:56:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.explananda.com/?p=2649#comment-6592</guid>
		<description>I also don&#039;t get the analytical/reflective distinction. Perhaps this means that I am too analytical and not reflective enough? Also, if &#039;reflective&#039; means anything, doesn&#039;t it mean something different from &#039;intuitive&#039;? Yet both &#039;intuitive&#039; and &#039;reflective&#039; are supposed to be indicators of slowness? Quoi?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also don&#8217;t get the analytical/reflective distinction. Perhaps this means that I am too analytical and not reflective enough? Also, if &#8216;reflective&#8217; means anything, doesn&#8217;t it mean something different from &#8216;intuitive&#8217;? Yet both &#8216;intuitive&#8217; and &#8216;reflective&#8217; are supposed to be indicators of slowness? Quoi?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

